IJARST Editorial Workflow — How IJARST Reviews and Publishes Your Research Paper in an International Journal
IJARST (International Journal of Advanced Research in Science and Technology) follows a transparent, structured editorial workflow for reviewing and publishing research papers in an international journal. Every manuscript submitted to IJARST goes through a clear, 8-step process that ensures rigorous double-blind peer review, fair editorial decisions, and rapid research paper publication with CrossRef DOI — all within one of the shortest publication timelines in peer-reviewed international journal publishing.
Whether you are a PhD student publishing your first research paper in an international journal, a faculty member seeking fast publication for career appraisal, or a researcher from India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Egypt, or Turkey looking for an affordable indexed international journal, understanding the IJARST editorial workflow helps you submit confidently and know exactly what to expect at every stage.
About the IJARST International Editorial Board
The integrity and quality of every research paper published in IJARST — one of India's leading peer-reviewed international journals for Engineering, Science and Technology — rests on the expertise and commitment of our international editorial board. The IJARST editorial board comprises experienced academics, researchers, and subject matter experts from leading universities and research institutions across India, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the broader international academic community.
Every manuscript submitted to IJARST for research paper publication in an international journal is assigned to editorial board members whose declared expertise precisely matches the subject area of the paper. This ensures that double-blind peer review is always conducted by the most qualified independent reviewers available — guaranteeing the rigour and fairness that defines IJARST as a credible high impact factor journal.
Editorial Board Member Selection Criteria
IJARST editorial board members are selected based on the following criteria:
- Active publication record in reputed peer-reviewed international journals
- Recognised subject matter expertise in declared research area(s)
- Current affiliation with an accredited university, research institution, or industry laboratory
- Commitment to ethical peer review and timely review turnaround
- Independence from any conflict of interest with submitted authors or institutions
Interested in joining the IJARST Editorial Board? Send your CV, ORCID profile link, and declared subject area expertise to editorijarst@gmail.com. Applications from experienced researchers in Engineering, Computer Science, AI, IoT, Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Science, and Life Sciences are especially welcome.
How IJARST Reviews and Publishes Research Papers — The 8-Step Workflow
Publishing a research paper in an international journal with IJARST follows a transparent, structured 8-step editorial process. Each stage maintains the highest standards of peer-reviewed research paper publication in an international journal while keeping the process fast, author-friendly, and clearly communicated.
| Step | Stage | What happens | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manuscript Submission | Author submits research paper via the IJARST online submission portal or emails to editorijarst@gmail.com with complete author details and manuscript attached. No submission fee. Submission is free for all authors — Indian and international. | Day 1 Free |
| 2 | Submission Acknowledgement | Upon receipt of the manuscript, the IJARST editorial office sends an acknowledgement email to the corresponding author confirming receipt and providing a manuscript reference. Authors who do not receive acknowledgement within 48 hours should re-submit or contact editorijarst@gmail.com. | Within 24 hours |
| 3 | Editorial Desk Review |
The editorial office conducts a preliminary desk review checking:
|
2–3 business days |
| 4 | Assignment to Subject Editor | Manuscripts passing desk review are assigned to a subject editor from the IJARST editorial board whose expertise matches the paper's specific discipline. The assigned editor cannot be from the same institution as any listed author. The subject editor selects 2–5 independent external reviewers with matching expertise. | 1–2 business days |
| 5 | Double-Blind Peer Review |
The manuscript is sent to 2–5 independent external peer reviewers. IJARST uses double-blind peer review — the author's identity is hidden from reviewers and the reviewer's identity is hidden from the author throughout the entire review process. This ensures unbiased, objective evaluation of every research paper.
Reviewers assess the manuscript for:
|
2–4 weeks (typically) |
| 6 | Reviewer Reports & Recommendation |
Each reviewer submits a detailed written report with a recommendation:
|
Within review period |
| 7 | Editorial Decision & Author Notification |
The subject editor issues a formal editorial decision by email to the corresponding author. The decision email includes:
|
1–2 days after reviews received |
| 8 | Acceptance, DOI Assignment & Publication |
Upon acceptance and APC payment confirmation, the IJARST editorial production team:
|
Within 6 Days ⚡ |
Possible IJARST Editorial Decisions — Explained
After double-blind peer review, authors receive one of four possible editorial decisions from IJARST. Every decision — including rejection — includes detailed reviewer feedback to help authors improve their research paper.
| Decision | What it means | What happens next |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Accept (Publish as Submitted) | Your research paper is accepted without requiring any changes. | Pay APC → published with CrossRef DOI within 6 days. |
| 🔵 Minor Revision | Small corrections needed — language, formatting, minor clarifications. The paper's overall quality and findings are sound. | Author addresses reviewer comments and resubmits. Editor reviews revised version. If satisfactory, proceeds to acceptance. |
| 🟡 Major Revision | Significant changes required — additional experiments, extended literature review, methodology improvements. The paper has potential but requires substantial work. | Author revises substantially and resubmits within stated deadline. Revised version may be returned to original reviewers before a final decision is made. |
| ❌ Reject | Paper is out of scope, has fundamental methodological flaws, lacks originality, or two or more reviewers independently recommend rejection. | Authors receive full reviewer reports explaining reasons for rejection. No APC is charged. Authors may revise and submit to a more appropriate journal. |
Responding to Reviewer Comments — Guidance for Authors
If your IJARST submission receives a Minor or Major Revision decision, the following guidance will help you prepare a strong revised manuscript:
- Read all reviewer comments carefully before starting revisions — understand what each reviewer is asking for before responding
- Prepare a point-by-point response letter — address every single reviewer comment individually, either by making the requested change or by providing a clear academic justification for not changing it
- Use track changes in your revised manuscript so editors can easily identify what has been modified
- Do not dismiss reviewer comments — even comments you disagree with should be addressed respectfully and with evidence
- Submit within the stated deadline — contact editorijarst@gmail.com in advance if you need a deadline extension
Special Editorial Situations
Withdrawal After Submission
Authors may withdraw their manuscript at any stage before acceptance by emailing editorijarst@gmail.com. Withdrawal after peer review has commenced should be avoided where possible, as it consumes reviewer time without benefit to the research community.
Appealing an Editorial Decision
If you believe your manuscript was rejected in error — for example, due to a misunderstanding of the research scope or an unfair review — you may appeal the decision by emailing editorijarst@gmail.com with a detailed written justification. Appeals are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief.
Checking Submission Status
To check the status of your submitted research paper, email editorijarst@gmail.com with your paper title and submission date. The editorial team responds within 24 hours.
IJARST Journal Quick Facts
| Full journal name | International Journal of Advanced Research in Science and Technology (IJARST) |
| ISSN | Print: 2319-1783 | Online: 2320-1126 |
| Impact Factor | Publication Impact Factor 6.76 · SNIP 3.868 |
| Publishing model | Open Access — CC BY 4.0 licence |
| Peer review type | Double-blind peer review |
| Publication frequency | Monthly — papers accepted year-round |
| APC — Indian authors | ₹1,600 (paid after acceptance — no submission fee) |
| APC — International authors | USD $50 (Indonesia, Malaysia, Egypt, Turkey, all countries) |
| DOI | CrossRef DOI assigned to every published paper |
| Indexing | CrossRef DOI · SJIF · Google Scholar · Index Copernicus · EuroPub · Academia.edu · ISI |
| Subject areas | Engineering · Science · Technology · Interdisciplinary research (30+ subjects) |
| Community | 2,000+ research papers published · Authors from 60+ countries worldwide |
Frequently Asked Questions About the IJARST Editorial Workflow
How does IJARST peer review work?
IJARST uses double-blind peer review. Every submitted research paper is evaluated by 2 to 5 independent subject matter experts. The author's identity is concealed from reviewers and the reviewer's identity is concealed from authors throughout the entire process — ensuring a fair, objective, and rigorous review of every manuscript.
How long does IJARST peer review take?
The complete IJARST editorial process takes approximately 3 to 5 weeks from submission to publication. Desk review: 2–3 business days. Double-blind peer review: 2–4 weeks. Publication with CrossRef DOI: within 6 days after acceptance and APC payment.
What happens if my paper is rejected?
If your research paper is rejected by IJARST, you will receive the full reviewer reports explaining the reasons for rejection. No APC is charged for rejected papers. Authors may revise their paper based on reviewer feedback and resubmit to IJARST as a new submission, or submit to another journal.
Can I submit a revised paper to IJARST after rejection?
Yes. If your paper has been substantially revised to address the concerns raised by reviewers, you may resubmit it to IJARST as a new submission. Include a cover note explaining how the paper has been revised in response to the previous review.
How do I check my IJARST submission status?
Email editorijarst@gmail.com with your paper title and submission date. The IJARST editorial team will respond with a status update within 24 hours on working days.
How many reviewers does IJARST assign per paper?
IJARST assigns 2 to 5 independent subject matter experts to review each submitted manuscript. The number of reviewers depends on the topic complexity and the quality of reviewer recommendations received.
What is included after my paper is accepted?
After acceptance and APC payment, IJARST provides: CrossRef DOI registration, open-access publication (CC BY 4.0), Google Scholar indexing, SJIF indexing, Index Copernicus indexing, free digital publication certificate, and permanent online archive. All included in the APC — no hidden charges.
Ready to Publish Your Research Paper in an International Journal?
IJARST is open for submissions year-round.
Impact Factor 6.76 · CrossRef DOI · Double-blind peer review · Published in 6 days · APC ₹1,600 India / USD $50 International
Questions? Email editorijarst@gmail.com — we respond within 24 hours
